Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Free Enounce My Speed
Good evening!
Yes, as developed by my colleague in the analysis above is quite acceptable. welcome that the Government should commit to provide basic services to the population, such as healthcare. are less in agreement, however, if you start talking about social equity, unless you establish precise limits, namely: to what extent we (artificially) to fill the inevitable difference in status between different "classes" or "bands ?
mean limits too high to try to clear each step, with unpleasant results such as those found beyond the curtain. spoke little or no equal, altraparte of such a selfish society, closed, unstable and rather careless. In this area, So, I would say take a good middle ground: just so to ensure basic services free of charge and redistribute the income, but not to forms of egalitarianism. I prefer a libertarian
society, where everyone has the opportunity to demonstrate their skills and talents, the best can emerge without a livellam
mean limits too high to try to clear each step, with unpleasant results such as those found beyond the curtain. spoke little or no equal, altraparte of such a selfish society, closed, unstable and rather careless. In this area, So, I would say take a good middle ground: just so to ensure basic services free of charge and redistribute the income, but not to forms of egalitarianism. I prefer a libertarian
society, where everyone has the opportunity to demonstrate their skills and talents, the best can emerge without a livellam
ent down, and in which joint the same rules for everyone to start. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure "safety nets" and a balanced and "just" a transfer in favor of the most difficult, especially in light of the fact, already stressed by Titian, which convey powers of resources (through taxes and higher disbursements) can have positive effects than negative ones of the deadweight loss.
A quick example is the explanation: suppose to deprive a person of 10 wealthy and provide a € said sums being insufficient. L '
marginal utility of the sum will be far superior to the latter for the former. The deadweight loss from an investment, although present, do not inficierà the result.
Unfortunately, this is not explicable by numbers and accounts, from an economic standpoint, there is a loss, not just discussed. Probably not from a social, indeed.
Just balance the two aspects, therefore, do not forget that "social point of view" can often result in simple common sense, considering the utility in a broad sense (or as I prefer, the "creative potential of happiness
") of each action.
ciaociao!
Henry
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment