For more media attack there, a fight will not fall for it. However, chronic with "warnings" of infiltration, speeches to parents, and even attempts to ridicule, are operations that can do much for those who are not embedded (but crossed) by a struggle to feel that this is not legitimate, or at least not much. Tap off the high schools in the Federal Capital, the usual display devices discursive media of the bourgeoisie put in place, had this time a star: the "infiltration". Here sought to trace the figures used by media discourse for education policy split in order to have a map of beliefs and platitudes (bourgeoisie) that eventually we will face struggles as players in education.
The operation of such devices is not linear and can not have someone listening to a publisher, be placed directly against a process of struggle. However, the figures that create these discourses (such as "infiltrators" among students, or simply "lazy students") are boyando somewhere in memory, until something activates them (which may be a student angry about not order to pursue a reactionary professor, or something simpler, like a little rain, etc). Course The speeches in favor of carrying out a process of struggle also generate their latent devices. However, it is precisely at times to unleash a process opened by a particular claim (such as high school students today) when you also struggle to assert a discursive devices to others, and therein lies the battle for legitimacy. Stakeholders will participate actively in the fight (for or against it), and they give nothing back. But there will also be constituted as such actors to whom you need to play to join the fight, and it is important to discuss face to face with bourgeois beliefs that seek to expand (or already extended).
I say the "infiltrator"
"We will return to ask the courts to give us a tool to clearly identify the kids in school are school students," said Education Minister Buenos Aires, Esteban Bullrich (http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/20-152261-2010-08-30.html). The "infiltration" was one of the figures or tables that several government ministers stirred to extend the idea that if schools are taken, it is because there are groups interested in flipping kirchneristas Macri, not because the roofs of schools falling apart (as expands Rodríguez Larreta, to acknowledge that there are "areas of Chavez in Argentina and the Cámpora" to "make schools and kids to lose a school day for politics" http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/ subnotas/152261-48921-2010-08-30.html). "All the comrades who were making clothes for your own colleagues?" Is a question that sets in advance the possibility that someone in making a school, is not there, and that any chronicler of a mobile journalist floor can make a student pass. At least the occasional moment when interviewed doubt about the provenance of all the people he saw (natural question, since humans we have the wonderful gift of forgetting), making the camera will be clipped to repeat over and over that moment of doubt. The following logical chain is part of the task of a bourgeois intellectual box: if in doubt, it is because someone is sure the school is not, if there is someone who is not the school, you're probably doing "politics"; and (obviously) if someone is bad policy. This simple chain works on the budget unfortunately has de-legitimization of political activity in Argentina, due to causes beyond the modesty of this writing.
However, in order to activate the discourse which refers to "infiltrators" in the footage, the media could only use the words of the bourgeoisie, and which could not easily find them unprepared students who stepped on a stick simpler than it seems. Here is another point that gives fruit organizing to strike with a single fist (in this case, through the Unified Coordination of Secondary Students, CUES), which is that the discourse of individual schools has been relatively unified , and his contacts with the bourgeois press have been almost exclusively through spokesmen did not deviate from the guidelines that guide the struggle.
The idea of \u200b\u200b"infiltration" also alludes to the problem is endemic, ie it is but do not know where or to what extent. That is why Bullrich calls a "legal tool": A stylish way to ask to use police procedure is known as within secondary schools to look for scapegoats to corroborate the idea of \u200b\u200binfiltration, basing a repressive regime issue around which always turns the state.
The most laughable of the matter is reached, when once the idea of \u200b\u200bhaving police in search of high school students fighting for their claims were exposed, extended, criticized and even declared unconstitutional (http://www.tn.com .ar/sociedad/112687/declaran-inconstitucional-identificar-alumnos-que-tomen-colegios). Infobae
tried to be the lead back to the arguments. "In between takes, is a student group dedicated to spy on colleagues: FEL, a group akin to the Labour Party, which prepares reports on high school students where they can be branded with contempt as" apolitical "or" faccionalizados "in reference those opposed to the group "(http://www.infobae.com/general/534920-101275-0-En-medio-las-tomas-hay-una-agrupacion-estudiantil-que-se-dedica-espiar -peers) writes the portal known for its poor journalistic skills. The note only deals with the verbose opinion going from a militant. While they may be criticized the militant said (Other issues, such as its marked sexism), it is not sighted in policing such a claim to seek those who do not support the fight. That is something that completes the middle and taking advantage makes the question was installed in advance, even if the minister who claimed Bullrich permits to suppress. Criminal
, alcoholic, lazy, or otherwise, gullible and innocent
"Ramal ..." reflects the cerebral Eduardo Feinman. "This is not an active member of the Labor Party? This confirms that this is totally politicized, that there are adults filling her head with the kids "(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSPxc5t8aGA). Beyond the clear Police dial keeps journalist and contributing to the process of persecution mentioned above, another aspect that refutes this statement is the constant consideration of the adolescent (or the "young" in general), as subjects unable to fend for themselves and eternally unable to decide anything. Moreover, full Feinman reflection by adding to this basic structure is thought to adolescence from bourgeois parameters, with that in the unlikely event that high school students decided to something about their lives, surely it is because someone injected them from outside.
"The authorities withdrew to make a criminal complaint. By leaving the school in the hands of children, being that they are teenagers, it was like to leave gas in the fire. They're teenagers and think they have the world ahead. This needs to download, you have to turn down the decibels "(minute 7:43), says the father of a student during the seizure of Normal No. 6, located in the neighborhood of Belgarno (http://www.clarin.com / sociedad/educacion/colegios_tomados-Ciudad_0_323967795.html). This testimony shows how at the time that high school students take a job on their hands than their parents and the teachers were unable or unwilling to carry out, are lifted from the perspective speeches and paternalistic protector (which implies understand this innate weakness which "Protects" or on which show). Students decide what, it sure is wrong in principle, from an alleged immaturity given by age, while the same "adults" now complain about the footage left high school students go through their noses for decades of dismantling state education.
Besides, the criminal complaint is referred to an alleged admission of alcohol at school during the shooting. This question is usually something stirring about teenagers in general and even more in a process of student struggle. Surely, many parents of students who stood up to fight, today will be hoping that their children will again be those alcoholics and drug addicts who lived burst weekend, went through life unconcerned about social conflicts in the country today as they were characterized in general. Luckily (and not so luckily) many side today show a maturity that should give envy.
division between content ("fair") and shape ("wrong")
no progress to a roof fall, sometimes politically incorrect, and the middle classes of the Federal Capital are specialists in trying to not look bad a microphone (although, of course, always the fascist component of the country's wealthiest district, classes means always try to "save face" ... not to risk a lot and that the known). This is something that can be seen in a chronicle of the daily La Nación "The curious locals peered while advancing column of adolescents, but those polled by La Nacion did not approve the method. "I feel good that claim by their schools, but not how. This hurts businesses, "said Leonardo Gonzalez, an employee of an optical Corrientes Avenue (http://www.lanacion.com.ar/nota.asp?nota_id=1296619). Usual this comment. However, the question "What would be the way?" Is rarely made by means bourgeois to his occasional interview, as they only have to de-legitimize the action. After a chronic editorializing means by the word of an occasional passerby and the question is there. However
more brutal fascism of the Argentine media now has a champion: Eduardo Feinman (brutal, especially for his eloquence and little plot development.) In this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stnoWZ5C_zk&feature=player_embedded) shows that the journalist does give his vision of what form (bourgeois) to settle things: the law for this view petitions would have to make a thousand individual and expect a minister pay attention to any such petitions. However, the student interviewed endlessly repeats the number of formal exhausted from the state to be responsive to the situation, until now decided to take direct action before taking the schools. So, it seems absurd compared to the creed of bourgeois law is a form that is carried forward by organizing, solidarity and direct action that break with individualism delegation which was conceived bourgeois right. Therein lies the need to divide the question.
The cultural battle is also the class struggle ...
discuss the split being sought between those who fight and those who "study" is to the cultural battle in every discussion with a classmate, a teacher or a parent. If our classmates interpret the fighting for better education is not (or should be) he (or the mate sitting next to him) who carries out, then the policy delegation mechanism will (and currently ) paid to ground beef political representation.
As anarchist militants believe it is necessary to give this discussion to make our fellow students and teachers to develop their political activity with the methods of direct action.
Tendencia Anarquista en Educación
www.tendenciaanarquista.com.ar // correo@tendenciaanarquista.com.ar
0 comments:
Post a Comment